Bosco Muchukiwa, “Surviving Intimidation: When having your research challenged upends your life as researcher”
Élisée Cirhuza, Irène Bahati, Thamani Précieux Mwaka and An Ansoms, “Work Without Pay? A critical look at the contracts and lived experiences of local researchers in the DRC”
Francine Mudunga, “Epistemological rupture, detachment, and decentering: requirements when doing research ‘at home’”
Anuarite Bashizi, “The egocentricity of field ethics: questioning otherness, decency and responsibility”
Thamani Mwaka Précieux, “Waiting for the morning birds: researcher trauma in insecure environments”
Godefroid Muzalia, “‘Businessisation of Research’ and Dominocentric Logics: Competition for Opportunities in Collaborative Research”
Josaphat Musamba and Christoph Vogel, “Umoja ni nguvu: towards more equitable collaborative research”
Élisée Cirhuza, “Taken out of the picture? The researcher from the Global South and the fight against ‘academic neo-colonialism’”
Aymar Nyenyezi Bisoka, “Can silent voices speak? When power relationships govern the conditions of speech.”
Emery Mudinga, “We barely know these Southern researchers! Reflections on some harmful assumptions about Southern research collaborators”
Stanislas Bisimwa Baganda, “‘They stole his brain’: The local researcher – a data collector, or researcher in his own right?”
Judith Buhendwa Nshobole, “‘Donor-Researchers’ and ‘Recipient-Researchers’: bridging the gap between researchers from the Global North and Global South”
Bienvenu Mukungilwa, “‘These Phantom Researchers’: What of their visibility in academic publications?”
An Ansoms and Irène Bahati, “When the room is laughing: from female researcher to researcher-prostitute”
Josaphat Musamba, “Navigating Armed Conflict Zones”
Précieux Thamani Mwaka, Stanislas Bisimwa Baganda and An Ansoms, “He’s hiding under his hat! Going in disguise to collect data in the field”
Eric Batumike Banyanga, “When an Armed Guide is Imposed on You: Navigating Research in a Conflict Zone”
Jérémie Mapatano, “When you become Pombe Yangu (My Beer): Dealing with the financial expectations of research participants”
Élisée Cirhuza Balolage and Esther Kadetwa Kayanga, “In the presence of white skin: the challenges arising from people’s expectations when encountering white researchers in the field”
Vedaste Cituli Alinirhu, “‘A research assistant is just an implementer’: the argument in favor of involving local researchers in project design”
Pierre Basimise Ngalishi Kanyegere, “The NGO-ization of Academic Research”
Joël Baraka Akilimali, “Escaping Big Brother’s gaze in research in the Global South”
Koen Vlassenroot, “Can collaborative research projects reverse external narratives of violence and conflict?”
Christian Chiza Kashurha, “‘Hold on; we’re still thinking it through.’ When will we get a report on your findings?”
Isaac Bubala Wilondja, “’Give Me Back My Words’: reflections on a forgotten aspect of participant follow-up”
Espoir Bisimwa Bulangalire, “The ‘Researcher-Glutton’: Data collection in insecure settings in the Global South”
François-Merlan Zaluke Banywesize, “Research, or Adventure? The lived experiences of researcher assistants”
Dieudonné Bahati Shamamba, “Lost in translation? Managing cultural differences in the face of risk in the field”
An Ansoms, “When the backpack is full: the omertà surrounding the psychological burdens of academic research”
Alice Mugoli Nalunva, “Between Passion and Precarity: the work of a researcher in the DRC”
While local researchers and research assistants carry out the bulk of research in the Congo, researchers based in the Global North continue to dictate the designs, timetables, and goals of most research projects in the country. Thus, the people designing the projects are often out of touch with realities on the ground, and may impose unrealistic expectations and demands on their colleagues in the South.
Researchers in the South, meanwhile, often feel unable to challenge these demands due to entrenched imbalances in power, resources, funding, etc. As Kash shows in this illustration, such pressures may at times force local researchers to make ethically questionable decisions in their work. For a candid and perceptive exploration of these dynamics, check out Esther Kadetwa’s essay “Reliable data? The pressure to deliver, versus the complexities of the field,” and Élisée Cirhuza’s “Remunerating researchers from the Global South: a source of academic prostitution?”
Naturally, every research cycle is contingent on adherence to several parameters, and a respect for scheduling is a fundamental element among these. Yet the schedules of many projects often fail to take into account the complexities of the situation on the ground. In many cases, a research assistant’s involvement is not limited to data collection alone. Also, the assistant must often work under the pressure of a timetable imposed by a donor who may not have a sufficient understanding of realities on the ground. Thus, the research assistant finds herself in an ambivalent position, caught between her Northern partner’s expectations, and the complexities of the field – and given very little room to manoeuver, in terms of conveying her concerns from the ground to the donor in the North.
Many of the essays in the Bukavu Series deal with the psychological toll that work in a conflict zone can take on researchers over time. In “When the backpack is full: the omertà surrounding the psychological burdens of academic research,” An Ansoms writes that this toll is further augmented by a culture of silence in academic circles. Few spaces exist in which researchers can show vulnerability and speak openly about the traumas they witness or experience during their work. Instead, people are expected to shoulder their psychological burdens silently and present a brave face to their colleagues. In this satirical image, Kash shows a Congolese and a foreign researcher being urged to believe that the human bones they have encountered in the field are just bonobo skeletons – rather than the obvious traces of a recent atrocity. Ansoms ends her essay with an impassioned call for a shift away from a culture of stiff-upper-lipped silence, towards one of openness and mutual support.
Over the past three years, while confronting my own nightmares after fifteen years of research in the African Great Lakes Region, I have had the opportunity to speak confidentially about this subject with dozens of researchers working in violent settings. Their words bore witness to an immense loneliness in the face of the psychological burdens connected to their research. Many are deeply traumatized by the violence that they have experienced, or witnessed, or heard about in their research participants’ accounts; or by their feelings of helplessness in the face of the injustices they encounter. Very few of these researchers have found the necessary space within their professional settings to talk about this; still fewer have been able to count on psychological support to process the effects. The omertà appears to be generalized.
An Ansoms, “When the backpack is full: the omertà surrounding the psychological burdens of academic research”